How to Build a Better (Squirrel!!) Trap

three children looking at a tablet computer

Fall semester has once again begun, and I’m still slogging along –no longer stuck, but moving– on my latest batch of as-yet unjoined essay rambles. And, once again, as sure as the cicadas that start up in July, begins the lament from my students in their first-of-the semester self-assessment papers:

“I used to read all the time, but I got too busy with [sports, extracurriculars, homework, …fill in the blank].”

“I used to write short stories when I was younger. I don’t know why I quit.”

And then comes the sentence that is most telling to me, perhaps answering the questions posed above as to why the change in reading and writing habits: “I guess it all happened when I got a [smartphone or laptop or gaming system].” Few are the students who say it out loud, but I think most of them –and most of us who are out of school– could say similar things.

I’d been meaning to for the last three semesters, but this time, I finally did it. I sent out an email opening up a conversation about why we’re all so prone to distraction and its evil sibling, procrastination. I’m curious to hear, in light of the recent pushback by some members of Gen Z against smartphones, just why they think this is. I don’t think many (any) of my students are in line to trade in their iPhones for flip phones, but I hear an increasing amount of commentary by my students’ generation about the ways that they feel a constant stream (scream?) of notifications is affecting not only their free time, but their mental health.

Toward the end of the email, I painted my students a picture, via statistics:

In 2007, the first iPhone was introduced. If they’re 18 today, they’d have been 2 years old.

In 2009, the Droid came out. They’d have been 4.

In 2010, the iPad was released. They’d have been 5.

I’m 50 years old as I write this. I didn’t own a smartphone until I was 38, and only bought an iPad in 2020 to help with online pandemic teaching.

These are the kids who grew up perhaps handed their parents’ iPad to keep them company during a long road trip. They might have been watching cartoons on their mom’s phone while riding in the cart at the grocery store. They’ve likely not known a world where the only options while waiting in line (or waiting for class to start) are striking up a conversation with the person next to them or just quietly watching the world.

Would Spaceman Spiff (Calvin and Hobbes fans will understand) have existed if Calvin had been given an iPhone? Maybe not. Have our phones stolen from us the art of daydreaming? Maybe so.

There’s a creativity to daydreaming –that other relative of distraction and procrastination– that doesn’t exist in the kind of distraction and procrastination that comes from a screen. Some of us creative weirdos would even say that daydreaming –mental margin, empty time and space to dream– is essential for our creative process. I’m one of those who would claim that. When I lost my two-hour commute to campus, I lost my prime time for mental margin: driving. I’ve since been able to replace that with a superior substitute (walking), but I hadn’t realized what I’d lost until I spent a summer sunk deep into the internet with the worst case of creative block I’d ever experienced. I point the finger of blame solidly at my tendency to scroll rather than type. I’d traded creativity for consumption, and the result was that at the end of the summer, I was exhausted and bored for no reason with nothing written to show for all my hours in the computer chair.

Since that revelation, I’ve tried to be more intentional about leaving some mental margin. I switch off my computer entirely on Saturday night before I go to bed. If I need the internet, I’ll use my iPad, but I take it off the charger. Once the charge is gone, I’m done. On Sundays I generally try (and often fail) to stick to analog: books. Notebooks. Pen and paper. I’ve very, very rarely had email on my phone (only when necessary, when I’m away from my computer and anticipate students who have trouble with an assignment), so this also means I don’t check my email on Sundays. I’ve already alerted my students (those who’ve read the syllabus, that is) that I’m offline on Sundays, so they’re aware. I will still open my email Monday morning to find a couple new emails, but I’ve not yet had a crisis over a Sunday due to abandoning my inbox for a day.

Has it helped? I believe so. Even just having that one day “off” my normal routine of morning writing and grading and taking breaks to scroll news sites or YouTube (I’m still off social media, except for a rare trip into Instagram now and then) has helped as a once-a-week reset.

Reset is an important concept. Reset, and the idea of mental margin. Some seek it by meditation, but I think there are even more possibilities for gaining that sense of openness and quiet in the mind. Prayer, for one. I spent a lot of my time up and down Highway 75 between Luverne and Sioux Center praying in an informal kind of way, just letting my thoughts go in the direction of a conversation with God. Sound weird? Maybe to some, but it’s the primary way I connect with God and find peace in the middle of things I don’t understand or don’t think I can handle. And that kind of prayer happens easily for me when there’s mental margin. It dies out when I’m surrounded by distractions. Prayer’s never been something I’ve struggled with, and I think that’s largely due to the fact that I treasure that mental margin. I notice a lack of peace, a rise of anxiety when it’s disrupted –although sometimes it takes me a whole summer to realize it.

So maybe that’s the center of all of this: mental margin. Learning to daydream again. Turning off the notifications and walking (literally) away from the screens every so often –or regularly. Here’s hoping that a conversation with my class brings about a renewed pursuit of focus –not just by trading in our iPhones for a flip phone or a weekly digital Sabbath, but learning to let ourselves rest as we go, to reclaim those before-class or in-the-hall moments by reconnecting with each other.

Oh, and my latest EDC (everyday carry) includes a flip phone. My daughter has said she gives it 3 months. (Her, in the car, trying to respond to a text while I’m driving: “This thing sucks!!” Me, quietly with an eyeroll: “Yes, that’s the point!”) I’m keeping my deactivated iPhone to use as an iPod (no Spotify on the flip phone), but it’s staying home for the most part. And no, I don’t see this as a short-term experiment. Where do I sign up for the grownup chapter of the Luddite Club?

Continue Reading

You may also like

On Anxiety (and Twitter)

Image by Naturelady from Pixabay

Seems to be a common thing these days, being a little more high strung and quick to pounce. Join a particularly contentious election year with a pandemic (and serious divisions as to how to fight it, avoid it, and live with it) and you’re bound to stumble into that, and its cousin —anger.

I quit social media entirely last September after I had a near-miss. A tweet I’d made was misinterpreted by someone who was concerned enough about it to mention it in an email to several people where I am employed, but oddly, wasn’t concerned enough about it to contact me personally. It wasn’t a Karen moment, just an ill-thought-out blurt. Unwise, but not fireable. Still, it made me think very carefully about whether social media was really worth the time I spent on it. Whether it was worth the second thoughts every time I wrote a post. Check my followers list, try to read it through their eyes. Make sure I was being clear, kind, wise, and speaking grace. Being that I was in the throes of my first semester teaching, I decided fairly quickly that it wasn’t worth the worry. I deleted my Facebook and my Twitter.

I found that once I got that knee-jerk sit-at-computer-type-facebook.com reflex out of my system, I didn’t miss it. Much. Okay, I missed a few of the friends —acquaintances and people I knew long ago and/or far away — but I really didn’t miss the format. I didn’t miss the foolish posts, the pot-stirrers, the “copy and paste this…,” the cute kitten posts. I certainly didn’t miss the nagging in my mind about whether the thing I’d posted earlier that day would get the wrong kind of attention.

But I started this new corner of the blogosphere in December, looking for a place of my own, a place where I could write in more than 144 characters or however many Twitter allows these days. Granted, I don’t really have an audience yet, but I’m working on it. And one of those ways, I decided, to build an audience was to return to Twitter. It’d been so long that they really actually did delete my account, so I had to start over. I’ve enjoyed it for the most part, but most of the time I’ve spent there, I’ve had my account set so that only my followers can read my tweets. I reassembled my follow list, found the people whose comments I found either interesting or edifying or thought-provoking. Twitter’s a great resource for writers. It’s a great way to get advice from people I’ll never meet in person, to get a glimpse into their everyday normal life. So, I reactivated. But I still sort of regret it sometimes.

With starting a new account comes the anxiety of posting and replying again. I’ve started a new habit of deleting my old posts at the end of the month, knowing all the while that when they say “the internet is forever,” they mean it.

And that takes me back around to the whole enormous risk anyone takes when they write. Now, this place feels safe to me. My audience of five (on a good day) isn’t terribly commentary. I haven’t started any arguments here, but it feels like a place where there’s more context. I have more space and more time and the ability to edit. But writing at all is always a risk. Where I land at the end of the argument with myself over whether to leave my words out there hanging on the page or in the air or on the forever internet is the fact that no matter how carefully I write, there’s always the possibility someone’s going to misread me. Take offense. Get hurt. It’s happened before. I’d be willing to bet that every seasoned writer has a story of such things happening.

Intent is a tricky thing. I can have all the best intentions and deeply wound someone with my words. A knife is a knife. I can be innocently cutting a slice of bread and catch my finger. My intent —to slice the bread— doesn’t stop the bleeding or the pain. I think words can be the same way. But then, the wound is sometimes a teacher also. Next time, I think as I head for the cabinet for a bandage, I’ll hold my knife differently. Next time, I’ll know better. Maybe it’s the same way with Twitter.

I sure hope so. For now, I can live with the anxiety. Maybe one day I won’t and my account will disappear, but today, the learning experiences are worth the risk.

“Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.”

—Maya Angelou

Continue Reading

You may also like

Noise, News, and White-Noise Anxiety

2020 has been an anxious year.

I don’t think I’m alone in that observation, either. Between every tempest in a social media teapot to the tempests in a test tube (Coronavirus), I don’t think many people are hanging on to this year as an example of living their best life. But then, when I look back, it’s often been the times when you struggle to find peace, to find beauty –and then find it– that I remember with less than the pain that they should bring. There’s something precious about joy that’s fought for and won. And this year, if there’s ever been a year, has been one where joy hasn’t come without a fight.

I’ve been so grateful to live where I do these days. June is still my favorite here. Temps in the low 80’s (usually), abundant sunshine, just enough rain and thunder to break up the monotony, and everything greens. Scientists in New York and other cities pointed out that during the time when we were all sheltering in place that there was a noticeable quiet. They could hear bird song again over everything else that was normally drowned out by the shuffle and bang of vehicles and machinery. Animals wandered the streets without the usual interference of people and bicycles and cars getting in their way, threatening. For the birds and rats and deer and opossums of the city, 2020 has been a less anxious time.

Which makes me realize what I have here. The sound level here really didn’t change at all. Perhaps fewer trailers full of screaming hogs being carted to their futures as bacon and ham. Fewer trucks clatter-banging over the railroad crossing just down the street from our house. The train that hauls corn and ethanol back and forth from one end of town to Worthington didn’t seem to pause much. Then again, the 6:30am train horn doesn’t wake me for long any more. I can’t really say I noticed. And the wrens in our back yard have always had enough aural space to be heard. Their only competition is the wind in the trees and grass today, and really, that’s more of an accompaniment than competition.

It’s startlingly easy to lose track of the outside world –that is, the world that the news media thinks is worth covering– on the porch. My “outdoor office,” I call it. Looking into my computer screen, I can see CNN’s concern about the President’s slurred speech and stumbling down a ramp, and I see Twitter trending things like #ww3. Close the computer, though, and it all goes away. Or, rather, my awareness of it does, for a little while. Not much has changed from last June to this one, judging by the sound level and wildlife count …and the height of my lawn, which always seems to need a mow.

Which brings up the question in my mind: what matters to me, anyway? What should matter? I read a book many years ago called Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, written by a guy named Jerry Mander. No kidding –that’s his actual name. In the book, he makes the case that television news distorts our impression of the world. Before television, we got the news from word of mouth, news often days or weeks old. Later, we developed newspapers, delivering day-old news at our doorstep each morning. Now we can flip on our screen and watch “news” as it happens. The book was written in the 1970’s, before we might have even been able to fathom the permanently scarring effect of watching 9/11 unfold on live television news. Relevance changes when you’re watching things happen. And relevance changes when you can see the whole world in a little lighted box. The potential answer to the question, “And who is my neighbor?” changes when that lighted box expands your virtual neighborhood to an entire world –places we’d never set foot. No wonder it’s so easy to feel anxious about it and so difficult to know where to start in terms of making it better.

In a way, it seems like television news has made the world’s business our business, and I’m not sure how I feel about that. Yes, it’s putting my head in the sand, but sometimes I’d just rather not know. I believe that the abundance of knowledge is what produces that buzz of white-noise anxiety that’s ramped up in the past few years. Knowing is a burden –that’s a Biblical concept, according to Ecclesiastes 1:18. The thing I question is whether or not that burden keeps us so overloaded with things that we can’t possibly change that we have no emotional space left to listen to the burdens of our physical (dare I say real?) neighbors. It’s a sticky question, and the “what will people think?” side of me is hearing you accuse me of not caring. But that’s not it, really. We’re not off the hook. Where is lasting change most immediately and effectively made? Locally. Not on social media or through an institution (though those things have a place). We can fly somewhere else for a week or two and do a “mission trip,” without really knowing a place or its people at all. We can send money somewhere and never know the impact it will have. But we can also get to know our actual neighbors and shoulder the burden of their everyday apocalypses. Cancer. Loved ones dying. Job loss. Illness.

Read in context, Acts 1:7-8, the “Great Commission,” addresses the disciples’ anxiety:
“When they were together for the last time they asked, ‘Master, are you going to restore the Kingdom to Israel now? Is this the time?'”
I think perhaps they were concerned with what they saw as priority: kicking some Gentile butt and making sure that God’s victory was clear in terms of enabling Israel to come to political power. Jesus responds:
“He told them, ‘You don’t get to know the time. Timing is the Father’s business. What you’ll get is the Holy Spirit. And when the Holy Spirit comes on you, you will be able to be my witnesses in Jerusalem, all over Judea and Samaria, even to the ends of the world.'”

In summer Bible camp, one of our leaders pointed out to us that this commission to make disciples goes like a ripple in a pond. Jerusalem was their immediate neighborhood, and the commission started there. The vision of the disciples could never be as immense or grand as the vision of God. He just showed them where to start, and assured us that He’d take care of the rest. We don’t get to know the time, though the signs of a world on fire are everywhere. But we do have power to start in Jerusalem, our own backyard. And for me, that relieves a whole lot of anxiety.

Until, that is, I realize that actually have to pay attention and do it. But then, that’s where the Holy Spirit comes in, right?

Continue Reading

You may also like