Kicking at the Darkness

Sunrise from the International Space Station

Starting a new thing this morning: I’m calling it Audiobiography Song Cycle. Every so often, I’ll pull a song out of my Spotify “Audiobiography” playlist, start there and run with the ideas. Here’s the first installment.

One of my favorite assignments as a prof is one I’ve called “Song Memory.” I have my students think of a song that they can’t hear without it bringing up a strong memory, and write about it –both the memory itself and how the song connects. John Warner, in his book The Writer’s Practice, which I now use as a text for my online writing course, has a version of this assignment that’s more focused on learning to write with sensory detail. At any rate, I’ve played with this idea of a sort of musical ekphrasis for a while, so here goes.

The first time I’d heard of Bruce Cockburn was in our time in California. Sam’s principal was a huge Bruce Cockburn fan and, bringing his guitar out once while we were visiting his family, introduced us to some of his music. I don’t remember it making much of a lasting impact on me at the time. But in my early blogging days, I followed a writer who quoted a Bruce Cockburn song in a post, and that image of “kicking at the darkness until it bleeds daylight” resonated. It’s such a clear image of the struggle we, particularly people who write, go through to reveal meaning in the stories we share.

When I returned to school in my early 40’s, figuring out not just how to use this gift I’d kicked around for years as a means to untangle my days but also figuring out the why of it all, why it was worth putting some of this stuff I’d been untangling, that lyric came back to me, at the end of an essay. I started with Sylvia Plath and ended up with Bruce Cockburn.

Most first drafts of my essays take a wild, strange journey from A to B. It’s one reason why revision, for me, isn’t ever an option. It’s a requirement, if I have any hope of a reader following the rabbit trails that go from my brain to the paper (or screen). I quite often start with a flash of an idea –a song, in this case, this morning– and usually don’t wind up figuring out the “what it’s about” until about page two or three.

With the essay I mentioned, I started with some of my original memories of college, back “when I was supposed to be there,” and wound through some of my experiences in returning to the place I’d abandoned two years in (I’d dropped out after my sophomore year), some of the memories that came back and how I interpreted them differently, having aged 25 years and gained some wisdom. The story of a non-traditional student mom probably isn’t all that unique, but since I’d returned to the same college where I started, I figured it was worth exploring some of the things I’d learned in the process of tying together a quarter-century gap in my educational adventure.

From there, my Page Two Revelation was that this was really about examining the work of writing. Figuring out why this long-practiced, newly-taken-seriously vocation of mine was worth so much time, risk, and finances to pursue in closing that 25-year gap. Why I’d returned in the first place to finish my degree. As a reader, I’d already discovered that one of the best reasons why stories are so important is that they make us feel less alone in the world. Much of why I wanted to write, and to share that writing in the world, was to take that chance to say “Have you ever felt this? Experienced this? Survived this? Here, I’ll go first…” in my writing. That “I’ll go first” was a huge reason I took the leap into putting my writing out into the world in the form of a blog in an obscure corner of the internet back in 2006 when I started. But in this particular essay, I was wandering back into some of the larger reasons I’d left college in the first place, reasons I hadn’t wanted to deal with. Reasons that had to do with failed dreams and failed hopes of relationships that never materialized. And that’s why I started with Plath.

Somewhere in my sophomore year on a grey, sad day, I’d wandered into the college library, over to the poetry section, and pulled Plath off the shelf. I flipped through the pages and found “Mad Girl’s Love Song,” which met me right where I was at the time. Not all of it, to be clear, but particularly that line, “(I think I made you up inside my head).” I’d just abandoned the education half of my major, and wasn’t entirely sure where my life or my education was going. Every decision I made in that week and those that followed seemed so real, so urgent, so life-shattering, …and yet, all of it was in my head. That memory was the thing that sparked the essay, when I realized that the very place where I’d stumbled up on that book as a disillusioned former education major was the exact place where my poetry class met, a quarter-century later. Writing it was an attempt to explore just one of the occasional discoveries I had, stringing together that 25-year gap.

As I kept writing, in the essay I left the college library and traveled into that quarter-century liminal space, empathizing with Plath’s feelings of shock and disorientation at finding herself a mother in “Morning Song.” Looking at “Lady Lazarus,” I leaned her experience of burning her writing against my own recent shredding of my old diaries and journals. For Plath, the burning was an act of destruction, but for me, shredding my old writing was a way of freeing myself to start something new. I found that in the ensuing 25 years after I put Plath back on the shelf, I no longer identified with her as much as I contrasted her experiences against my own.

But the essay wasn’t quite complete. I did then what I typically do, letting it rest for a few days, returning later to hear that line from Cockburn’s song again in my head, and it wound up the whole journey perfectly.

Writing is my act of kicking against the darkness, waiting for the daylight to spread. That was why all this work and risk and time and struggle was worth it. Worth it for the act of putting my words out there as an invitation to no longer be alone, Worth it for the fact that all this stuff in my head needed a place to go, Worth it because I realized what seemed to be almost too late that this was the thing I was meant to do all along –I’d just missed all the signs. And in that wander from Plath to Cockburn, I think I started to see the daylight bleeding through.

Continue Reading

You may also like

A Long Winter’s Silence

photography of leafless tree surrounded by snow

I haven’t seen bare ground anywhere around here since December. It’s been a long, long winter. The last storm that I recall dumping this much snow was April of 2018, and then, we knew that it was likely the last snow of the season.

But when it snowed in December, then a foot or more in early January, I knew we had a long way to go yet. We had a short February thaw, a few days above freezing, enough to melt the ice dams and the gargantuan icicles that had formed on the corner of the parsonage. And now, we’re wearily awaiting the arrival of another foot dump of snow, just when the patio furniture was beginning to emerge from the drift it’s been encased in since New Year’s week.

We attempted a trip to Dell Rapids this morning for my physical therapy appointment to fix my frozen shoulder and abandoned just short of half-way. The first round of snow had already arrived, and visibility was deteriorating. But on the way back from the van, there it was: the clean hush of new-fallen snow. One of my favorite things about first-snows back when I was a child. That, and the way the sky glowed at night, once everything was covered. Out here, the glow isn’t as evident, since we’re no longer in a town, but the silence is still there, perhaps even more intensely.

The silence was a reminder to me that even in the middle of a long, weary winter, there’s still beauty to be found. And it was a reminder to me that the long silence I’ve experienced in my writing life just might have some beauty and wonder behind it as well.

I’m currently in a season of silence, surrender, and listening. Not much else to do, really. I start something, and it circles, wanders, goes back into something I’ve written already about a dozen times. And that’s where I generally quit. It all gets sucked back into the same rut, it seems, with no new epiphanies. So, I’ve held on to that idea of silence all afternoon.

My typical antidote for writer’s block is just doing the next thing, starting somewhere random and running with it, but unfortunately that’s led to about six months of wandering, circling, treading water. Maybe I haven’t been paying enough attention, I’ve thought. Maybe I need more margin in my day. Maybe I need to read more. Yet none of this has really helped me regain momentum. So, today, I’m going to focus on what’s right in front of me: silence. And maybe that’s just what I need, because it’s what I seem to have been delivered in spades.

Today, I’ll write about the silence, I thought. So, here I am. A foot and a half deep in the white, clean hush of winter quiet, listening for what comes through, trying to be patient.

Continue Reading

You may also like

A Rather Cynical Look at “Writer’s Block”

silver macbook on white table

Does anyone actually still read books in 2022? Forget books –does anyone even still read blogs in 2022?

Going even further, does anyone read anything longer than a web page in 2022? Maybe that’s the more appropriate question. I started reading Nicholas Carr’s The Shallows a few weeks ago (spoiler alert/confession: I scanned the final four chapters because I lost interest), and since then I’ve been questioning how much and how permanently not just society’s reading habits have changed, but my own have as well.

Sure, most of us spend multiple hours behind a glowing screen or carry one around with us all day, but does that kind of reading even count? One of Carr’s main arguments is that the convenience and pervasiveness of the internet has harmed our ability to focus on longer, more complex reading tasks. Instead of sitting at the breakfast table behind a newspaper (which is really, I suppose, another type of scan-reading), or instead of reading a book in the recliner on Saturday afternoon or in the evening after supper, we get our hits of information from short bursts of reading. Snatches of ideas. Little snacks of information rather than balanced meals of knowledge that come with reading whole books or reading multiple pieces on a given subject. In addition to losing our collective attention span, what we’ve lost –and what I see as the biggest danger– is context.

And just as deep reading in context is lost, what I see from my own personal internet habits since I’ve returned home for work is the ability to write well. I’ve seemed to forget how writing is HARD. Well, good writing is hard. First-draft blogs like this one are less hard, but even now, I’m realizing that while I started out with a germ of an idea, it’d have been far better to have built even a sketch of an outline. What do I want to say? What’s the point, anyway? I’m not sure I could’ve answered when I typed the tentative title.

I’ve abandoned Facebook for about two years now, but I’ve kept an on-again, off-again Twitter account, and that also is an entirely different sort of first-draft writing. I don’t really feel the need a plan to compose 280 characters or less on what I did last weekend or to blurt out a reaction to the latest outrage trigger. –Of course, I try to avoid the latter. A growing annoyance with contextless outrage posting was the main reason for abandoning Facebook and the reason I have an arms-length, skeptical relationship with my Twitter account. How much can you really change the world for the better with a 280 character post, anyway? I suppose it’s been done, but I struggle to find an example.

While I’ve heard many writers (especially in the early days of Twitter) claim that the 280 character limit is a helpful constraint and good practice at building maximal meaning in a minimum of words, what it’s done for me is far more insidious. I find that after dropping several of the writing habits I kept during my undergraduate classes and my MFA (daily journaling, regular deep reading, revision), I now tend to prefer the lazy route. Most of what I’ve written since May has been half-hearted morning pages every few days when I feel like it and a couple Twitter responses or posts a day. Not surprisingly, writing a longer piece now seems insufferably difficult. I started two pieces in the last few months in the old-fashioned manner, pen and paper to try and get my groove back, and I’m finding that what I end up with is something more like a jumble of disjointed notes than a cohesive first-draft of an actual essay. Things go all over the place. I typically hit my stride (and figure out my “what’s this really about”) around page three, … and then I lose the energy and focus to continue. I leave a bulleted list of possible future paragraph points and I tell myself I’ll come back to it later. And then when I do, I’m so disgusted by my lack of coherence that I abandon what I have and follow a different path.

Some might call this writer’s block. What this ramble is telling me, however, is not that I’m blocked. I’m out of shape.

As to what’s caused that, I’m not certain that I can solely blame the internet. Sure, my habits there don’t help matters at all, but there’s something else going on, and I think the answer lies in a lack of discipline overall. I’ve reestablished the habit of a daily walk, and found I’d forgotten how much the combination of physical activity, getting outdoors, and being able to listen through the noise in my head helps me see things more clearly. I’m forcing myself as I write this to finish my idea, something I rarely do any more through my morning pages. I know that morning pages aren’t supposed to have a point, necessarily, but I’ve been so frustrated with the lack of direction that’s shown up there that I’ve nearly abandoned the practice. It’s not the morning pages, though, just like it wasn’t just the internet or even just social media. It’s a bigger problem of losing the practice of doing deep work. Of paying attention. Of remembering why I do this. Without ideas, writing is pointless, and I think therein lies my problem: good ideas come at a cost. They require focus and discipline and work to wrangle them into words that have power to change things for the good.

At the risk of unwinding my whole point here with cheesy nostalgia, here’s where I insert the clip from my childhood memories of Debbie Allen from Fame since this came to mind, and I’ll end my ramble here for today.

Continue Reading

You may also like

On Wednesdays, we blog? On Writing Habits and Doing the Work

black pencil on white paper

One side effect of this new at-home working, (very) freelance writing lifestyle is that I forget far too often what day it is. I seem to have lost my sense of routine. The daily routine is coming together, but the weekly rhythms are still a bit wobbly. For instance, this morning I opened my laptop and typed “On Tuesdays, we blog.” …But it’s not Tuesday, I quickly discovered. I’d fully intended to put a ramble of some sort or another up yesterday, but either or both the muse and the time got away. One of my objectives for the month is to get this little corner of the internet rolling on a regular basis again, if for no other reason, to get some words out into the world again.

A favorite quote of mine is from John Darnielle, from back in the days when we had writing conferences. At the Calvin Festival of Faith and Writing back in 2016, he said, “Writer’s block is a bourgeois luxury,” to an audience of understanding writers. I think at the time, the line was delivered with a bit of frustrated derision, and received with knowing laughter and awkward applause. His point was that if we claim to write for an occupation, we need to develop the discipline of showing up. The habit of AIC: “ass in chair” –or more delicately, “butt in seat,” as Anne Lamott and others have written. If we show up, the words will follow, because the words are material, not an ethereal substance that floats in through the window given the perfect circumstances. A carpenter doesn’t get to claim “builder’s block.” No, she grabs the tools and the lumber and gets to work. Simple enough, right?

Until it’s not.

Until this year, I had a backlog of ideas. College and grad school broke the dam that had been holding back twenty years of writing material. I could drop everything and write three pages on dryer lint. Seriously. So, going from that to …silence? This is deeply disturbing to me. I have plenty of life going on, don’t get me wrong. A complete life shift, completely unexpected. Parenting teenagers who are turning out profoundly different than I’d expected. Re-examining long-held beliefs. Gaining new perspectives on things I took for granted as fact. And yet, the words aren’t following the life experiences this time. Nor are they guiding my way through all of this. Some of this is due to the fact that I know now that some stories must age. Some stories aren’t mine to tell. Some stories shouldn’t be out in the world at all, but settle in the pages of my journal. Maybe some of this chapter of my life will wind up in words, but for now, the time isn’t right.

So, now what? All this time at my disposal, and I’m struggling to find things to write about. First world problems, I’m sure some of my writer friends who’d kill for just a weekend free of other responsibilities to do some dedicated writing would say. Well, for now, I’m reading again, surrounding myself with gorgeous writing. Debra Marquart’s The Night We Landed on the Moon is on my reading table, along with Kathleen Norris’s Dakota. I’m becoming inspired from Marquart’s work to take things in pieces. Just focus on an individual scene, an single scrap of memory, and go deep with it. Maybe that’s enough for this season of writing. Sculpt the beads and wait for the thread that connects them all to appear. Dakota reminds me that yes, other people really write this kind of stuff –books that connect place and meaning. Reading Dakota for the first time gave me permission to write the things that go through my head, and encouraged me that an audience for that kind of writing is out there, even if there might not be enough of them to routinely put that kind of beauty and depth onto the New York Times bestseller list. In a world where shock, fear, and outrage gets everyone’s attention, it’s good to remember that getting attention is only part of the problem of finding your readers.

Well, that’s where I am on this Wednesday morning. Doing the work, even if it’s just “writing about writing,” something that I remember so bugged a fellow student in my MFA cohort. I think I get why, but …well, it’s not going to stop me. At least not this morning.

Continue Reading

You may also like

MFA in Creative Writing, a Post-Degree Retrospective, Pros and Cons (part 1)

Part 1: Background and Overview

Getting my MFA in creative writing was not in the plan when I went back to school in 2015 to complete my abandoned bachelor’s program as a non-traditional student. However, the more I sunk into student life, the more I realized that the advice I’d given my husband years ago could apply to myself. “If you enjoy school this much,” I advised my aspiring-professional-student husband, “you should really consider teaching.”

At least then you’d be paid to go to school, was my line of thinking.

So, hesitantly, I put an application in to one (yes, only one) Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing program in the last year of my undergraduate work. My location ruled out a traditional MFA (the University of Minnesota, Mankato is the closest school which offers an MFA in creative writing, a two hour drive away), but I discovered a small low-residency program at Augsburg University in Minneapolis, an easy three-ish hour drive from where I live. Low-residency programs are mostly online, with (in Augsburg’s case, a yearly ten-day) “residency” where students attend an intensive in-person set of workshops and courses. Many MFA programs require two or three residencies per year, so Augsburg’s once-a-year summer residency worked better for my life and was much more affordable.

I applied to Augsburg late in 2016, and after a wait that was far more agonizing than I’d anticipated, I was accepted to the program’s creative non-fiction cohort in early March. Between March and May, I wavered. I wasn’t quite ready to take the financial gamble involved in continuing my education, but I didn’t really feel I was done with school just yet. I was increasingly drawn to the possibility of teaching on the college level.

However, when I walked for my graduation ceremony, I’d put aside the idea of getting an MFA. It was expensive, it was kind of scary, and I wasn’t sure I would be successful at teaching. Writing, however, I knew I could do. And that, I could do with an MFA or without. My plan at that point was to find a job that would pay the bills (i.e. student loans), build a (virtual) shed in the backyard and write in my off-hours.

Pro #1: Ability to Teach on the University Level

…In retrospect, the shed would’ve been cheaper, even if I had built the actual thing. But I couldn’t shake the desire to give my long-held dream of teaching a shot. About a week after graduation, I decided to take the leap. One of Augsburg MFA’s best features is that it’s one of the only low-residency programs to feature a teaching concentration. In traditional, fully-in-person MFA programs, students apply to be a graduate teaching assistant, funding all or part of their education by receiving on-the-job training in teaching basic undergraduate English writing courses. Low-residency programs, however, typically attract people with established careers, people who are looking for a way to polish their writing skills or publish their writing, not remain in the world of academia post-graduation. Augsburg’s program was exactly what I needed.

So, there was my justification. I could get my MFA, and have the possibility of teaching once I was done. Was it risky? Yes. Teaching jobs in academia —particularly teaching jobs in the humanities in the middle of an economic downturn and a pandemic— are extremely difficult to come by. Things may have looked slightly rosier a few years ago, but even then, I was never under the delusion that earning my MFA would guarantee my finding a teaching job. In retrospective, however, it was well worth it in my case. I wouldn’t have the job I have today (an adjunct instructor at my undergraduate university) without having earned my MFA.

An MFA in creative writing can be considered to be a terminal degree, which means that while it may not allow you to be addressed as “Dr. Lastname,” it does the job as far as opening the door to teaching on the university level. In my MFA program, the research component is an in-depth (in my case, twenty-four pages) “craft paper” on a topic pertaining to an issue in our genre. The main writing component is a creative thesis. In my case, this was a 180-page essay collection. Others in my program (in other genres) have written screenplays, poetry collections, novels, and plays.

Could I send my completed thesis/manuscript out to publishers? Perhaps, with a little reformatting and polishing. Many others have started their career as a published writer with their MFA thesis. However, other graduates and our mentors cautioned us that publishing one’s MFA thesis as-is, right out the gate is the exception and not the norm. Typically, an MFA creative thesis can be considered finished for academic purposes, but may still be a work in progress as to whether it’s publishable or not. Still, a few graduates of my MFA program already have books out currently or forthcoming. Some had published even before they began the program. Others have started literary magazines and small presses of their own.

Did I make the right choice, all things considered? Would I do it again? …Probably. Would I advise someone else to do it? That depends on a number of things. More pros and cons are forthcoming, point-by-point, in the following few posts to help you make the decision for yourself, if you’re considering an MFA in creative writing.

Continue Reading

You may also like

On Anxiety (and Twitter)

Image by Naturelady from Pixabay

Seems to be a common thing these days, being a little more high strung and quick to pounce. Join a particularly contentious election year with a pandemic (and serious divisions as to how to fight it, avoid it, and live with it) and you’re bound to stumble into that, and its cousin —anger.

I quit social media entirely last September after I had a near-miss. A tweet I’d made was misinterpreted by someone who was concerned enough about it to mention it in an email to several people where I am employed, but oddly, wasn’t concerned enough about it to contact me personally. It wasn’t a Karen moment, just an ill-thought-out blurt. Unwise, but not fireable. Still, it made me think very carefully about whether social media was really worth the time I spent on it. Whether it was worth the second thoughts every time I wrote a post. Check my followers list, try to read it through their eyes. Make sure I was being clear, kind, wise, and speaking grace. Being that I was in the throes of my first semester teaching, I decided fairly quickly that it wasn’t worth the worry. I deleted my Facebook and my Twitter.

I found that once I got that knee-jerk sit-at-computer-type-facebook.com reflex out of my system, I didn’t miss it. Much. Okay, I missed a few of the friends —acquaintances and people I knew long ago and/or far away — but I really didn’t miss the format. I didn’t miss the foolish posts, the pot-stirrers, the “copy and paste this…,” the cute kitten posts. I certainly didn’t miss the nagging in my mind about whether the thing I’d posted earlier that day would get the wrong kind of attention.

But I started this new corner of the blogosphere in December, looking for a place of my own, a place where I could write in more than 144 characters or however many Twitter allows these days. Granted, I don’t really have an audience yet, but I’m working on it. And one of those ways, I decided, to build an audience was to return to Twitter. It’d been so long that they really actually did delete my account, so I had to start over. I’ve enjoyed it for the most part, but most of the time I’ve spent there, I’ve had my account set so that only my followers can read my tweets. I reassembled my follow list, found the people whose comments I found either interesting or edifying or thought-provoking. Twitter’s a great resource for writers. It’s a great way to get advice from people I’ll never meet in person, to get a glimpse into their everyday normal life. So, I reactivated. But I still sort of regret it sometimes.

With starting a new account comes the anxiety of posting and replying again. I’ve started a new habit of deleting my old posts at the end of the month, knowing all the while that when they say “the internet is forever,” they mean it.

And that takes me back around to the whole enormous risk anyone takes when they write. Now, this place feels safe to me. My audience of five (on a good day) isn’t terribly commentary. I haven’t started any arguments here, but it feels like a place where there’s more context. I have more space and more time and the ability to edit. But writing at all is always a risk. Where I land at the end of the argument with myself over whether to leave my words out there hanging on the page or in the air or on the forever internet is the fact that no matter how carefully I write, there’s always the possibility someone’s going to misread me. Take offense. Get hurt. It’s happened before. I’d be willing to bet that every seasoned writer has a story of such things happening.

Intent is a tricky thing. I can have all the best intentions and deeply wound someone with my words. A knife is a knife. I can be innocently cutting a slice of bread and catch my finger. My intent —to slice the bread— doesn’t stop the bleeding or the pain. I think words can be the same way. But then, the wound is sometimes a teacher also. Next time, I think as I head for the cabinet for a bandage, I’ll hold my knife differently. Next time, I’ll know better. Maybe it’s the same way with Twitter.

I sure hope so. For now, I can live with the anxiety. Maybe one day I won’t and my account will disappear, but today, the learning experiences are worth the risk.

“Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better.”

—Maya Angelou

Continue Reading

You may also like

2019 Book List*

Automat by Edward Hopper
Automat, Edward Hopper

Starting a new tradition this year: the annual listing (with a few short reviews) of books I’ve read in the past year. I’m hoping that this will spread the reading love a little, and keep me accountable to regular reading in my post-MFA/post-student life. Honestly, I had to check my Goodreads account (for the uninitiated: like social media for readers, and essential to anyone with a Kindle who likes to track their yearly reading habits) just to verify which I’d actually read in 2019 and which I read at the end of last year. I do a lot of reading over Christmas break and between semesters, so sometimes one year blends into another. Some of these were required reading for my MFA, which might explain the few oddball selections (Eat The Apple, for example) that I wouldn’t have read by my own choice. Take these not as wholesale recommendations, but as a record of what you can do in a year when you’re working part time, have three teenagers at home, are full-time in a graduate program, and managing to sleep 5-7 hours a night. For me, reading is one of the Big Rocks in my priority jar.

Read and Finished:

Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis by J. D. Vance

Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World by Cal Newport

Inventing the Truth: The Art and Craft of Memoir, edited by William Zinsser

Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place by Terry Tempest Williams

Rethinking School: How to Take Charge of Your Child’s Education by Susan Wise Bauer

Undaunted: Surviving Jonestown, Summoning Courage, and Fighting Back by Jackie Speier

Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen by Jose Antonio Vargas

Eat the Apple by Matt Young

Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books by Azar Nafisi

On Course: A Week by Week Guide to Your First Semester of College Teaching by James M. Lang

God Land: A Story of Faith, Loss and Renewal in Middle America by Lyz Lenz

On Reading Well: Finding the Good Life through Great Books by Karen Swallow Prior

There, There by Tommy Orange

When Women Were Birds: Fifty-four Variations on Voice by Terry Tempest Williams

What Does the Bible Really Teach on Homosexuality? by Kevin DeYoung

Draft No. 4: On the Writing Process by John McPhee

The Situation and The Story: The Art of Personal Narrative by Vivian Gornick

Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell

Started but Didn’t Finish:

Rooted in the Earth: Reclaiming the African American Environmental Heritage by Dianne D. Glave

Onigamiising: Seasons of an Ojibwe Year by Linda LeGarde Grover

Jesus Feminist: God’s Radical Notion that Women are People, Too by Sarah Bessey

A Couple I’m Probably Forgetting About:

Likely three or four books on budgeting, minimalism, WordPress (…Dude, this building-a-site-from-near-scratch is not easy stuff, when you’re used to the spoon-fed version on the free site, lemme tell you), and blogging.

So, there you have it. 2019 in books, approximate count: 18 – 20 finished, a few not yet. Goal for next year: 30 finished books, now that I have All This Time that I’m Not Writing Response Papers.

*Now, with links!

Continue Reading

You may also like