Creative Writing MFA Pros and Cons (part 2)

closeup photo of assorted title books

Pro #2: Dedicated Time to Write

(Second in a series of posts designed for people considering the pros and cons of earning a Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing, specifically a low-residency MFA. I’m one year out from completing mine, and thought I’d share my experience. The first post in the series can be found here.)


Ask any MFA graduate what they liked best about their program, and they’re likely to mention the dedicated time (and, perhaps, permission) to write. An MFA program should get you in the habit of doing the two things that can make nearly anyone a better writer: focused, habitual reading and regular, disciplined writing. 

Some days are more productive than others, but no work will ever be done if you don’t clock in and show up. A good MFA program will give you something to show up to.

Many of us who write find that we can procrastinate these two essentials right out of our lives far too easily. Reading falls by the wayside, replaced with social media, work obligations, aimless internet browsing, and social media. Writing falls victim to short blasts on Twitter, useless arguments on Facebook, emails, and everything else that comes our way. The quickest way to get a clean house around here is usually to get me started on a writing project. Procrasticleaning, procrastibaking, procrastinapping, call it what you will, but all are very real enemies of getting sh…tuff done on the page. Homework and deadlines and feedback from your mentor and cohort help fight against these tendencies.

A good MFA program will also push you to your limits in terms of writing regularly and writing a lot. You will learn quickly that “The Muse” is a myth. If there is a muse, it’s activated by applying your behind to a chair and writing whatever comes to mind on a regular basis. Those who write when the spirit strikes are usually those who find themselves wondering why they never complete anything. As John Darnielle so aptly put it during a workshop years ago at the Calvin Festival of Faith and Writing (I may be paraphrasing), “writer’s block is a bourgeois luxury.” 

If you’re a working writer, you learn that working people keep regular hours. Some days are more productive than others, but no work will ever be done if you don’t clock in and show up. A good MFA program will give you something to show up to. It will keep you accountable. It will teach you how to become a working writer and how to stare down the intimidation of a blank page. In the case of a low-residency program like the one I graduated from, it will also force you to find a balance between your day job and your writing life. 

Pro# 3: Dedicated Time to Read

I can’t speak for every MFA program, but reading was a huge part of mine. I fell into writing mainly as a side-effect of two things: I’ve been an avid reader since childhood, and I journal to keep myself sane. The readings I was assigned in my MFA program gave me a sense of what’s out there in the world. I read things I’d never have picked up on my own (hello, Eat the Apple). I was exposed to a plethora of different writing styles, genres, and more book recommendations than I could possibly keep up with. During my first year’s summer residency, I started carrying around a small notebook just to keep track of all the book recommendations our mentors brought up in workshops and classes. 

I developed a deeper knowledge of contemporary and classic literature, which books were being talked about, which authors were in vogue (or not, often because of their behavior beyond the page). I learned the importance of reading outside my own experience, of amplifying voices outside my own world by reading and recommending, and now, assigning books by authors whose voices must shout over that of the majority to be heard. That exposure to a variety of other writers broadened my own writing and gave me many models to follow, or at least to experiment with. Even more valuable than the depth and breadth and volume of reading we accomplished, we learned to read as writers. We learned to go from saying, “I love this book” to being able to articulate why we loved it. We were encouraged to look into the writing craft of a book. 

Could a person do this without the structure and expense of an MFA program? Absolutely. For many, this might be the better route to take. Writers have compiled books that essentially form a sort of do-it-yourself MFA. What the books don’t come with, however, is accountability. Without the external motivation of completing something like an academic program, developing those habits will be more difficult —but not impossible. The accountability (and, hopefully, if you picked a good program) encouragement that comes within the community of an MFA program is something that would be difficult to replicate on one’s own. You could possibly start or join a local writers’ group, join an online writers’ forum, find a friend to read your work and keep you motivated, but then, the community is another reason many are attracted to an MFA program. More on that in a day or two. 

Continue Reading

You may also like

MFA in Creative Writing, a Post-Degree Retrospective, Pros and Cons (part 1)

Part 1: Background and Overview

Getting my MFA in creative writing was not in the plan when I went back to school in 2015 to complete my abandoned bachelor’s program as a non-traditional student. However, the more I sunk into student life, the more I realized that the advice I’d given my husband years ago could apply to myself. “If you enjoy school this much,” I advised my aspiring-professional-student husband, “you should really consider teaching.”

At least then you’d be paid to go to school, was my line of thinking.

So, hesitantly, I put an application in to one (yes, only one) Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing program in the last year of my undergraduate work. My location ruled out a traditional MFA (the University of Minnesota, Mankato is the closest school which offers an MFA in creative writing, a two hour drive away), but I discovered a small low-residency program at Augsburg University in Minneapolis, an easy three-ish hour drive from where I live. Low-residency programs are mostly online, with (in Augsburg’s case, a yearly ten-day) “residency” where students attend an intensive in-person set of workshops and courses. Many MFA programs require two or three residencies per year, so Augsburg’s once-a-year summer residency worked better for my life and was much more affordable.

I applied to Augsburg late in 2016, and after a wait that was far more agonizing than I’d anticipated, I was accepted to the program’s creative non-fiction cohort in early March. Between March and May, I wavered. I wasn’t quite ready to take the financial gamble involved in continuing my education, but I didn’t really feel I was done with school just yet. I was increasingly drawn to the possibility of teaching on the college level.

However, when I walked for my graduation ceremony, I’d put aside the idea of getting an MFA. It was expensive, it was kind of scary, and I wasn’t sure I would be successful at teaching. Writing, however, I knew I could do. And that, I could do with an MFA or without. My plan at that point was to find a job that would pay the bills (i.e. student loans), build a (virtual) shed in the backyard and write in my off-hours.

Pro #1: Ability to Teach on the University Level

…In retrospect, the shed would’ve been cheaper, even if I had built the actual thing. But I couldn’t shake the desire to give my long-held dream of teaching a shot. About a week after graduation, I decided to take the leap. One of Augsburg MFA’s best features is that it’s one of the only low-residency programs to feature a teaching concentration. In traditional, fully-in-person MFA programs, students apply to be a graduate teaching assistant, funding all or part of their education by receiving on-the-job training in teaching basic undergraduate English writing courses. Low-residency programs, however, typically attract people with established careers, people who are looking for a way to polish their writing skills or publish their writing, not remain in the world of academia post-graduation. Augsburg’s program was exactly what I needed.

So, there was my justification. I could get my MFA, and have the possibility of teaching once I was done. Was it risky? Yes. Teaching jobs in academia —particularly teaching jobs in the humanities in the middle of an economic downturn and a pandemic— are extremely difficult to come by. Things may have looked slightly rosier a few years ago, but even then, I was never under the delusion that earning my MFA would guarantee my finding a teaching job. In retrospective, however, it was well worth it in my case. I wouldn’t have the job I have today (an adjunct instructor at my undergraduate university) without having earned my MFA.

An MFA in creative writing can be considered to be a terminal degree, which means that while it may not allow you to be addressed as “Dr. Lastname,” it does the job as far as opening the door to teaching on the university level. In my MFA program, the research component is an in-depth (in my case, twenty-four pages) “craft paper” on a topic pertaining to an issue in our genre. The main writing component is a creative thesis. In my case, this was a 180-page essay collection. Others in my program (in other genres) have written screenplays, poetry collections, novels, and plays.

Could I send my completed thesis/manuscript out to publishers? Perhaps, with a little reformatting and polishing. Many others have started their career as a published writer with their MFA thesis. However, other graduates and our mentors cautioned us that publishing one’s MFA thesis as-is, right out the gate is the exception and not the norm. Typically, an MFA creative thesis can be considered finished for academic purposes, but may still be a work in progress as to whether it’s publishable or not. Still, a few graduates of my MFA program already have books out currently or forthcoming. Some had published even before they began the program. Others have started literary magazines and small presses of their own.

Did I make the right choice, all things considered? Would I do it again? …Probably. Would I advise someone else to do it? That depends on a number of things. More pros and cons are forthcoming, point-by-point, in the following few posts to help you make the decision for yourself, if you’re considering an MFA in creative writing.

Continue Reading

You may also like

What’s Going On: 2020 Playlist

black vinyl player

I grew up in the times of “boom boxes,” “ghetto blasters,” and cassette tapes. 8-tracks are at the far edge of my memory, from my grandparents collection of Marty Robbins and Conway Twitty in the basement by the stereo cabinet to a Carpenters 8-track that I vaguely (and possibly incorrectly) recall our car at one point.

So, it’s a wonderful thing to have access to more music than I could possibly listen to via the internet. Our Spotify subscription has become as much a necessary monthly expense as groceries -and that’s only a small exaggeration. The kids have their own usernames on our family account now. I drew the line after the fourteenth playlist of Parry Gripp tunes invaded my carefully curated commute playlists. …Click that link at your own risk, by the way.

If you need a soundtrack to “These Unusual Times” that isn’t the drone of CNN or Fox News in the background (NPR at our house – no cable), I humbly suggest Marvin Gaye’s classic, What’s Going On, from 1971. Amazing how something made that long ago speaks so accurately to current events.

Seriously prophetic stuff. And I mean that in the definition of prophecy not as future-telling, but as something designed to move a a person to action.

Continue Reading

You may also like